首页> 外文OA文献 >A double blind, fixed blood-level study comparing mirtazapine with imipramine in depressed in-patients
【2h】

A double blind, fixed blood-level study comparing mirtazapine with imipramine in depressed in-patients

机译:一项双盲,固定血药浓度研究,比较了米氮平与丙咪嗪在抑郁症患者中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

textabstractAntidepressant effects of mirtazapine and imipramine were compared in a randomized, double blind, fixed blood-level study with in-patients in a single centre. Patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depression and a Hamilton (17-item) score of ≤ 18 were selected. After a drug-free and a placebo-washout period of 7 days in total, 107 patients still fulfilling the HRSD criterion of ≤ 18, started on active treatment. The dose was adjusted to a predefined fixed blood level to avoid suboptimal dosing of imipramine. Concomitant psychotropic medication was administered only in a few cases because of intolerable anxiety or intolerable psychotic symptoms. Eight patients dropped out and two were excluded from analyses because of non-compliance; 97 completed the study. According to the main response criterion (50% or more reduction on the HRSD score) 11/51 (21.6%) patients responded on mirtazapine and 23/46 (50%) on imipramine after 4 weeks' treatment on the predefined blood level. Such a dramatic difference in efficacy between antidepressants has not often been reported before. The selection of (severely ill) in-patients, including those with suicidal or psychotic features, may have significance in this respect. Optimization of treatment with the reference drug imipramine through blood level control, exclusion of non-compliance for both drugs, exclusion of most concomitant medication and a low drop-out rate may also have contributed. It is concluded that imipramine is superior to mirtazapine in the patient population studied.
机译:在一个单中心住院患者的随机,双盲,固定血液水平研究中,比较了米氮平和丙咪嗪的抗抑郁作用。选择DSM-III-R诊断为重度抑郁且汉密尔顿(17个项)评分≤18的患者。经过总共7天的无毒和安慰剂冲洗期后,仍满足HRSD≤18标准的107名患者开始积极治疗。将剂量调节至预定的固定血药水平,以避免丙咪嗪剂量不足。由于极度的焦虑或无法忍受的精神病症状,仅在少数情况下使用了精神药物。 8名患者退学,其中2名因不合规而被排除在分析之外; 97完成了研究。根据主要缓解标准(HRSD评分降低50%或更多),在规定的血药水平下治疗4周后,米氮平对患者的反应率为mirtazapine,丙二胺为23/46(50%),率为21.6%。以前从未经常报道过抗抑郁药之间如此巨大的功效差异。在这方面,选择(重症)住院病人,包括具有自杀或精神病特征的住院病人可能具有重要意义。还可以通过控制血药水平来优化参考药物丙咪嗪的治疗,排除两种药物的不依从性,排除大多数同时用药以及辍学率低。结论是,在研究的患者人群中,丙咪嗪优于米氮平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号